|
The Cranebrook Site is typical of many former
Commonwealth sites in Western Sydney in that there was no scientific
assessment to determine the sites Natural and Aboriginal Heritage
values before it was disposed of by the Federal Government. This
site has escaped any proper assessment up until now.
IFC Capital Ltd were required to do a
comprehensive study of the sites flora and fauna and they hired a
consultant called Conacher Travers to do the site assessment.
Conacher Travers did not assess the whole site yet their report
confirms the site has immense conservation value. The report says
they found 240 plant species (179 native; 39 exotic) which indicates
they can't identify some plants. 87 fauna species were recorded (
56 bird, 18 mammal, 6 reptile, 4 amphibian and 3 molluscs) Under the
TSC Act there were 7 threatened flora species, 2 Endangered
Ecological Communities and 2 threatened fauna species found.
Conacher Travers study appears to be
flawed, even
though they found many species on the site. What they omitted from
their findings was the presence of a further two Endangered Ecological
Communities - Castlereagh Swamp Woodland and Alluvial Woodland.
These are significant omissions as Castlereagh Swamp Woodland
appears to be the dominant community within the proposed development
areas. This assertion came about following a site inspection of the
proposed development areas by Teresa James a renowned expert in
Western Sydney vegetation. Ms James wrote a report based on her
visit and this important information has been passed onto Penrith
Council and the Department of Environment and Conservation. This new
information presents a major constraint to any development. A
determination by Council that fails to take this information into
account could lead to the need for legal intervention. The
author of this website and other concerned citizens have also found
anomalies in Conacher Travers mapping of the endangered Persoonia
nutans (Nodding Geebung). We have found many Persoonia nutans not
found by Conacher Travers. The ones they missed and we found happen
to be in areas IFC Capital propose to develop. This is more new
information Penrith Council needs to take into consideration in its
assessment of the IFC proposal. The
Conacher Travers study claims:
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
This Flora
and Fauna Survey Report has been prepared by Conacher Travers Pty
Ltd to identify the flora and fauna characteristics of Lot 2 DP
1057347 The Northern Road Cranebrook.
In respect of
matters required to be considered in the Environmental Planning
& Assessment Act (1979) and relating to the species / provisions
of the Threatened Species Conservation Act (1995), two (2)
threatened fauna species, seven (7) threatened flora species and two
(2) endangered ecological communities were recorded within or in
close proximity to the subject site. These included, Eastern
Freetail-bat (Mormopterus norfolkensis), Cumberland Plain Land Snail
(Meridolum corniovirens), Acacia bynoeana, Allocasuarina glariecola,
Dillwynia tenuifolia, Grevillea juniperina subsp. juniperina,
Micromyrtus minutiflora, Persoonia nutans, Pultenaea parviflora,
Cooks River / Castlereagh Ironbark Forest and Shale / Gravel
Transition Forest.
In
respect of matters required to be considered in the Environment
Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999) six threatened
flora species, Acacia bynoeana, Allocasuarina glariecola, Dillwynia
tenuifolia, Micromyrtus minutiflora, Persoonia nutans and Pultenaea
parviflora were recorded. The results of detailed ecological survey
and assessment indicate that the site is likely to contain
'important populations' of each of these species. Therefore a
referral to Department of the Environment & Heritage should be
required.
IFC
Capital Ltd has employed another Environmental Consultancy firm
called Eco Logical
Australia to do an environmental constraints study for the site.
Eco Logical based this study primarily on the work of Conacher
Travers and some minimal field studies of the site. The findings of
this study had to take into consideration the Regional Conservation
Assessment requirements of the NSW Department of Environment and
Conservation (DEC). This was meant to identify areas of Core or
Support to Core habitat. Eco Logical found that over 66%
of the site or 124 hectares are Core habitat, 36
hectares are Support to Core habitat and that 20 hectares has
no classification.
These
findings by Eco Logical prove that the majority of the site has high
conservation value and has no development potential. The findings
show that the proposal by IFC Capital to develop 85 hectares will
destroy large areas of Core and Support to Core habitat.
|